1Muhammad Azhar, 2Sumaryanti, 3Ali Munir
1,2,3Departement of Sport and Helath Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-13Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
Shaping the character and motor development of students is the main goal of physical education learning. This study aims to evaluate: (1) Evaluation of the context of the Penjas learning program at MTS Negeri 1 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia; (2) arrangement of Penjas learning program inputs at MTS Negeri 1 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia; (3) implementation of the Penjas learning program at MTS Negeri 1 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia; and (4) the results of the Penjas learning program at MTS Negeri 1 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. The evaluation model of this research is CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). The place where this evaluation research was carried out was at MTS Negeri 1 Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi and was carried out on September 18-25, 2023. The research sample used a non-probability sampling technique through a purposive sampling approach, namely 1 school principal, 1 PJOK teacher, and 33 MTs Negeri 1 BauBau students in Southeast Sulawesi. Data collection techniques use observation, questionnaires, and documentation. Descriptive quantitative data analysis by processing acquisition data is then categorized into four categories, namely very good, good, good enough, and not good. The results showed that: (1) the program planning component with indicators of the relevance of the 2013 curriculum to learning in schools at very good category standards; (2) program structuring components with indicators of Penjas teacher background and student involvement, Penjas facilities and infrastructure, and Teacher Competency Standards in the good category standards; (3) program implementation components with indicators of preparation and implementation of Penjas learning in the good category standards; and (4) program outcome component student achievement achievement indicators on good category standards.
KEYWORDS:Evaluation, Learning, CIPP, Students.
REFERENCES1) I. R. Mulyani and M. Annas, “Evaluation of Pjok Learning in Class XI Students of SMK Roudhlotul Mubtadiin Balekambang,” Indones. J. Phys. Educ. Sport, vol. penelususr, no. jurnal physical education and sport, pp. 188–196, 2020.
2) S. Raibowo and Y. E. Nopiyanto, “Evaluation of Sports & Health Physical Education Learning in Public Junior High Schools in Mukomuko Regency through the Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP) Approach,” J. Pendidik. Kesehat. Rekreasi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 146–165, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.mahadewa.ac.id/index.php/jpkr/article/view/673
3) R. Parma, F. Hudayani, and A. Asnaldi, “Implementation of Sports and Health Physical Education Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Ilm. Bid. Pendidik. Olahraga, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2022, doi: 10.31932/jpdp.v8i1.1492.
4) W. I. Rojali, N. Ngadiman, D. R. Budi, P. J. Nurcahyo, and A. R. Febriani, “Online Learning Evaluation of High School Physical Education, Sports and Health Subjects in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era,” J. MensSana, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 92–99, 2021, doi: 10.24036/menssana.06012021.24.
5) D. Ramadhani, I. M. S. Mahardika, and N. Indahwati, “Evaluation of online-based PJOK learning on the level of understanding and learning motivation of grade IV - VI Sd Negeri Betro, Sedati - Sidoarjo students,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 328–338, 2020, doi: 10.58258/jime.v7i1.1817.
6) D. Ratna, S. J. Tangkudung, and A. S. Hanif, “Evaluation of the Regional Training Center Program (Pelatda) of Pasir Putri Volleyball Dki Jakarta,” J. Ilm. Sport Coach. Educ., vol. 2, pp. 8–16, 2018.
7) P. C. P. Dewi and K. D. Vanagosi, “Evaluation of Archery Performance Development Program of Perpani Karangasem Regency,” J. Pendidik. Kesehat. Rekreasi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–111, 2019.
8) J. Irmansyah, “Evaluation of the beach volleyball achievement coaching program,” J. Keolahragaan, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 24, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jk.v5i1.12759.
9) M. Pratiwi, Ridwan;, and Waskito;, “Evaluasi Teaching Factory Model Cipp,” J. Imiah Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 414–421, 2019.
10) M. Turmuzi, I. G. Ratnaya, S. W. Al Idrus, A. A. I. Paraniti, and I. N. B. S. Nugraha, “Literature Review: Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation Using CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product),” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7220–7232, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3428.
11) Nurhayani, Yaswinda, and M. A. Movitaria, “CIPP Evaluation Model in Evaluating Character Education Programs as an Educational Function,” J. Inov. Penelit., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2353–2362, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/download/1116/839
12) N. Neldawati and Y. Yaswinda, “CIPP Evaluation of the Application of Permendikbud 137 and 146 of 2014 in Sijunjung District,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2954–2961, 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2066.
13) I. Gunawan, “Learning Program Evaluation,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018.
14) R. Novalinda, A. Ambiyar, and F. Rizal, “Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Tyler: Goal-Oriented,” Edukasi J. Pendidik., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 137, 2020, doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v18i1.1644.
15) S. Kadir, H. Dulanimo, A. B. Usman, E. D. P. Duhe, and S. Hidayat, “Evaluation of the Physical Condition Component of Karate Athletes,” Jambura J. Sport. Coach., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2022, doi: 10.37311/jjsc.v4i1.13445.
16) B. Priyono, “Development of Sports Industry Development Based on Management Regulatory Approach to Sports Activities Management,” J. Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 112–123, 2017.
Volume 07 Issue 03 March 2024
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 05 (May 2024).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 May 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.